Marcus David Toro v. Al Emondi et al
Marcus David Toro |
Al Emondi, Gaurav Sharma, Patrick Ganzer, Sakhrat Khizroev, Jacob Robinson, Patrick Connolly, David Blodgett, Pulkit Grover, Krishnan Thyagarajan, Michael D Zmura, Thomas Naselaris and Ping Liang |
2:2022cv00467 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Denying #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Marcus David Toro. (ghap) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants David Blodgett, Patrick Connolly, Michael D Zmura, Al Emondi, Patrick Ganzer, Pulkit Grover, Sakhrat Khizroev, Ping Liang, Thomas Naselaris, Jacob Robinson, Gaurav Sharma, Krishnan Thyagarajan pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Choolijian., filed by plaintiff Marcus David Toro. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.