Guosheng Fan et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| GUOSHENG FAN, Xin JIANG, YUYI FAN, ZHIHENG FAN, YANHUA GUO, JUNSHENG XUE, KUN XUE, YINGYUE CAI, YI ZHANG, QIANG LI, JIAJIN LI, XU WANG, JING XU, YAN CHIT WANG, HONGYAN SUO, SHI YA, QIANHAN YA, JUN LI, BAOER LI, LIPING ZHANG, CHAYONG LIANG, QIANLIN LIANG, HUIYING WANG, REN XIN, NIAN XIN, ZHUPING YE, SHUYAO YE, FAN YANG, YANGHANG YE, HUI ZHANG, LIJUAN HOU, ZIQI ZHANG and ZITONG ZHANG |
| UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICE, Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center |
| 2:2022cv00494 |
| January 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #20 . Defendants Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center answer due 6/8/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services answer due 6/8/2022. (twdb)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to June 8, 2022 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,,,,,,, 1 filed by Defendant Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Beck, Daniel) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center answer now due 5/9/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services answer now due 5/9/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,,,,,,, 1 filed by Defendant Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.(Beck, Daniel) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel A Beck counsel for Defendants Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Adding Daniel A. Beck as counsel of record for United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center. (Attorney Daniel A Beck added to party Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center(pty:dft), Attorney Daniel A Beck added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (pty:dft))(Beck, Daniel) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Louisa Wu APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Guosheng Fan, et al., designating Arthur Minas as local counsel. (twdb)
|
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Louisa Wu to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Yingyue Cai, Guosheng Fan, Yuyi Fan, Zhiheng Fan, Yanhua Guo, Lijuan Hou, Xin Jiang, Baoer Li, Jiajin Li, Jun Li, Qiang Li, Chayong Liang, Qianlin Liang, Hongyan Suo, Huiying Wang, Xu Wang, Yan Chit Wang, Nian Xin, Ren Xin, Jing Xu, Junsheng Xue, Kun Xue, Qianhan Ya, Shi Ya, Fan Yang, Shuyao Ye, Yanghang Ye, Zhuping Ye, Hui Zhang, Liping Zhang, Yi Zhang, Ziqi Zhang, Zitong Zhang (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 1/26/2022, Receipt No. 32687247) filed by Plaintiff Yingyue Cai, Guosheng Fan, Yuyi Fan, Zhiheng Fan, Yanhua Guo, Lijuan Hou, Xin Jiang, Baoer Li, Jiajin Li, Jun Li, Qiang Li, Chayong Liang, Qianlin Liang, Hongyan Suo, Huiying Wang, Xu Wang, Yan Chit Wang, Nian Xin, Ren Xin, Jing Xu, Junsheng Xue, Kun Xue, Qianhan Ya, Shi Ya, Fan Yang, Shuyao Ye, Yanghang Ye, Zhuping Ye, Hui Zhang, Liping Zhang, Yi Zhang, Ziqi Zhang, Zitong Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Minas, Arthur) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Louisa Wu to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Yingyue Cai, Guosheng Fan, Yuyi Fan, Zhiheng Fan, Yanhua Guo, Lijuan Hou, Xin Jiang, Baoer Li, Jiajin Li, Jun Li, Qiang Li, Chayong Liang, Qianlin Liang, Hon #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. (lt) |
|
Filing 14
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE DAVID O. CARTER by Judge David O. Carter. (kdu)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:21-cv-01758 DOC(ADSx). Case transferred from Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-00494 DOC(ADSx). Signed by Judge David O. Carter (rn)
|
| Filing 12 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (iv) |
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), as to Civil Process Clerk. (iv) |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to U.S. Attorney General. (iv) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Director of The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services California Service Center. (iv) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Louisa Wu to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Yingyue Cai, Guosheng Fan, Yuyi Fan, Zhiheng Fan, Yanhua Guo, Lijuan Hou, Xin Jiang, Baoer Li, Jiajin Li, Jun Li, Qiang Li, Chayong Liang, Qianlin Liang, Hongyan Suo, Huiying Wang, Xu Wang, Yan Chit Wang, Nian Xin, Ren Xin, Jing Xu, Junsheng Xue, Kun Xue, Qianhan Ya, Shi Ya, Fan Yang, Shuyao Ye, Yanghang Ye, Zhuping Ye, Hui Zhang, Liping Zhang, Yi Zhang, Ziqi Zhang, Zitong Zhang (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32687247) filed by Plaintiff Yingyue Cai, Guosheng Fan, Yuyi Fan, Zhiheng Fan, Yanhua Guo, Lijuan Hou, Xin Jiang, Baoer Li, Jiajin Li, Jun Li, Qiang Li, Chayong Liang, Qianlin Liang, Hongyan Suo, Huiying Wang, Xu Wang, Yan Chit Wang, Nian Xin, Ren Xin, Jing Xu, Junsheng Xue, Kun Xue, Qianhan Ya, Shi Ya, Fan Yang, Shuyao Ye, Yanghang Ye, Zhuping Ye, Hui Zhang, Liping Zhang, Yi Zhang, Ziqi Zhang, Zitong Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Minas, Arthur) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #5 filed by Plaintiff Yingyue Cai, Guosheng Fan, Yuyi Fan, Zhiheng Fan, Yanhua Guo, Lijuan Hou, Xin Jiang, Baoer Li, Jiajin Li, Jun Li, Qiang Li, Chayong Liang, Qianlin Liang, Hongyan Suo, Huiying Wang, Xu Wang, Yan Chit Wang, Nian Xin, Ren Xin, Jing Xu, Junsheng Xue, Kun Xue, Qianhan Ya, Shi Ya, Fan Yang, Shuyao Ye, Yanghang Ye, Zhuping Ye, Hui Zhang, Liping Zhang, Yi Zhang, Ziqi Zhang, Zitong Zhang. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Minas, Arthur) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet, 2 Summons, 3 Summons, 4 Summons, 5 Summons are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 . The following error(s) was found: Please remove the et al from the caption of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Louisa Wu on behalf on Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
