Ahmad Fateh v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| Ahmad Fateh |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Los Angeles Asylum Office, David Radel, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H Kim, MATTHEW D EMRICH, Christopher A. Wray and Matthew D. Emrich |
| 2:2022cv00536 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 36
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Re: Stipulation to Stay the Case Pending Adjudication of Application #35 , that the instant action shall be STAYED until 8/15/2022. (jp)
|
| Filing 35 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending ADJUDICATION OF APPLICATION filed by Defendants Matthew D. Emrich, Ur M. Jaddou, Ted H Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Radel, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Christopher A. Wray. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Matthew D. Emrich(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Ted H Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Los Angeles Asylum Office(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party David Radel(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party United States Department of Homeland Security(pty:dft), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Christopher A. Wray(pty:dft))(Osinoff, Joanne) |
| Filing 34 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant Christopher A. Wray served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 33 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 32 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant David Radel served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant Los Angeles Asylum Office served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 30 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant Ted H Kim served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant Matthew D. Emrich served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, upon Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security served on 1/31/2022, answer due 4/1/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Hu, Evan) |
|
Filing 25
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 24 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Christopher A. Wray. (car) |
| Filing 23 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (car) |
| Filing 22 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant David Radel. (car) |
| Filing 21 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles Asylum Office. (car) |
| Filing 20 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (car) |
| Filing 19 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ted H Kim. (car) |
| Filing 18 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (car) |
| Filing 17 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Matthew D. Emrich. (car) |
| Filing 16 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States Department of Homeland Security. (car) |
| Filing 15 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh, (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Hu, Evan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32678167 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Ahmad Fateh. (Attorney Evan Hu added to party Ahmad Fateh(pty:pla))(Hu, Evan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
