George Jones v. Kenneth Meng Won et al
George Jones |
Kenneth Meng Won, Karen Soming Won and Does 1-10 |
2:2022cv00554 |
January 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Fernando M Olguin |
Margo A Rocconi |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ALL DEFENDANTS [ECF NO. 21] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation and finding good cause therein, hereby ORDERS that the instant action is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party responsible for its own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (yl) |
Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to settlement filed by Plaintiff George Jones. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Dismissing Case)(Steven, Laura) |
Filing 20 ORDER VACATING UPCOMING DEADLINES IN ANTICIPATION OF SETTLEMENT [ECF NO. #19 ] by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court, having considered the Notice of Settlement and finding good cause therefor, ORDERS as follows: (1) all discovery dates are continued by sixty (60) days; (2) all pretrial and trial dates are vacated pursuant to the Courts Reassignment Order, dated February 14, 2022 (ECF No. (16) and (3) the parties shall file a notice of dismissal or, in the alternative, a joint statement advising the Court of the status of the settlement within sixty (60) days of this Order. (yl) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff George Jones. (Steven, Laura) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Karen Soming Won answer now due 3/1/2022; Kenneth Meng Won answer now due 3/1/2022, filed by defendants Karen Soming Won; Kenneth Meng Won.(Attorney Kenneth D Kan added to party Karen Soming Won(pty:dft), Attorney Kenneth D Kan added to party Kenneth Meng Won(pty:dft))(Kan, Kenneth) |
Filing 17 STATEMENT re: Order, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings #16 . (Steven, Laura) |
Filing 16 REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. Please refer to the Order for complete details. IT IS SO ORDERED. (kd) |
Filing 15 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#22-018) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, this case is transferred from Judge Fernando M. Olguin to the calendar of Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-00554 MEMF(MARx). (rn) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Jones, upon Defendant Karen Soming Won served on 1/31/2022, answer due 2/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Karen Soming Won in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hakimi, Anoush) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Jones, upon Defendant Kenneth Meng Won served on 1/31/2022, answer due 2/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kenneth Meng Won in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hakimi, Anoush) |
Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff George Jones, (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kenneth Meng Won. (et) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Karen Soming Won. (et) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attached Face Page of Complaint)(Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attached Face Page of Complaint)(Shahriari, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32682209 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party George Jones(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.