Zoelee Issac v. Matthew Atchley
| Zoelee Issac |
| Matthew Atchley |
| 2:2022cv00570 |
| January 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Granting #5 APPLICATION for Extension of Time. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is GRANTED and Respondent may file a Motion to Dismiss or an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed in this matter on or before April 30, 2022. (es)
|
|
Filing 5
APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File a Motion to Dismiss or an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Declaration of Christopher G. Sanchez filed by Respondent Matthew Atchley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sanchez, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Christopher G. Sanchez on behalf of Respondent Matthew Atchley. (Attorney Christopher George Sanchez added to party Matthew Atchley(pty:res))(Sanchez, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND INSTRUCTIONS GOVERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition or a Motion to Dismiss the Petition not later than 28 days after the filing date of this Order. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Attach 1 of 2, #2 Attach 2 of 2) (es)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Filing Fee $5 PAID), filed by Petitioner Zoelee Issac. (lh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zoelee Issac v. Matthew Atchley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Zoelee Issac | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matthew Atchley | |
| Represented By: | Christopher George Sanchez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
