Julien Ngue Manguelle et al v. Ur Mendoza Jaddou et al
| Julien Ngue Manguelle and Rebecca Lynn Urioste |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Lory C. Torres and Merrick B. Garland |
| 2:2022cv00606 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Julien Ngue Manguelle, Rebecca Lynn Urioste. Dismissal is With prejudice. (Skomra, Taiyyeba) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Julien Ngue Manguelle, Rebecca Lynn Urioste, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Proof of Service on DHS, #2 Affidavit Proof of Service on Attorney General)(Skomra, Taiyyeba) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Tracy Wilkison, Interim United States Attorney (car) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Merrick B. Garland. (car) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Lory C. Torres. (car) |
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (car) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Julien Ngue Manguelle, Rebecca Lynn Urioste, identifying N/A. (Skomra, Taiyyeba) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Julien Ngue Manguelle, Rebecca Lynn Urioste. (Attachments: #1 Proposed summons, #2 Proposed summons, #3 Proposed summons)(Skomra, Taiyyeba) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Julien Ngue Manguelle, Rebecca Lynn Urioste. (Skomra, Taiyyeba) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32694151 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Julien Ngue Manguelle, Rebecca Lynn Urioste. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5) (Attorney Taiyyeba Safri Skomra added to party Julien Ngue Manguelle(pty:pla), Attorney Taiyyeba Safri Skomra added to party Rebecca Lynn Urioste(pty:pla))(Skomra, Taiyyeba) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
