Brigette Huit v. Frank Trevino
Plaintiff: Brigette Huit
Defendant: Frank Trevino
Case Number: 2:2022cv00632
Filed: January 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott and Lodging of Proposed Judgment and Order. Objections to R&R due by 3/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Report and Recommendation) (san)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . THE COURT, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDS that the District Court issue an Order: (1) accepting this Report and Recommendation; (2) deeming Plaintiff a vexatious litigant; (3) directing the Clerk not to file any document in a closed action, a new civil action, or an IFP application submitted by Plaintiff unless she has submitted a motion for leave to file the document and a Judge of this Court has granted the leave requested; (4) denying Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and (5) dismissing this action with prejudice. [See document for details.] (san)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause #9 filed by Plaintiff Brigette Huit (es)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/21/2022. [SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS.] (san)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF LODGING FOR NON ELECTRONIC FILING filed by Plaintiff Brigette Huit. (jtil)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF LODGING CLAIM FOR INJURY OF DAMAGES filed by Plaintiff Brigette Huit. (jtil)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Lodging Request for Ptichess Report filed by Plaintiff Brigette Huit. (jtil)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Brigette Huit. (jtil)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brigette Huit. (jtil)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Brigette Huit against Defendant Frank Trevino. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Attachments: #1 CV71, #2 Summons Request) (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brigette Huit v. Frank Trevino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brigette Huit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Trevino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?