Tamara Eichelberger v. Mary Hudson-McKinney et al
Tamara Eichelberger and Dr Tamara Eichelberger |
Mary Hudson-McKinney, Western University of Health Sciences, Dr Mary Hudson-McKinney and Does 1-10 |
2:2022cv00663 |
January 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Mary Hudson-McKinney, Western University of Health Sciences. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Attachments: #1 CV11C Statement of Consent) (et) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Tamara Eichelberger. (Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tamara Eichelberger, (Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tamara Eichelberger. (Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Tamara Eichelberger. (Bjorgum, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32709788 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Tamara Eichelberger. (Attorney A Eric Bjorgum added to party Tamara Eichelberger(pty:pla))(Bjorgum, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.