Marissa Hernandez v. City of West Covina et al
Marissa Hernandez |
City of West Covina, Officer Osided, Officer Hernandez, Laurie Pruitt, Eddie Gomez, Ken Plunkett and Richard Bell |
2:2022cv00682 |
January 31, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #3 by Judge Percy Anderson. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lom) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Marissa Hernandez. (jtil) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Marissa Hernandez. (jtil) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Marissa Hernandez filed by Plaintiff Marissa Hernandez against Defendants Richard Bell, City of West Covina, Eddie Gomez, Hernandez, Osided, Ken Plunkett, Laurie Pruitt. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (Attachments: #1 CV71, #2 Summons Request) (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.