Michael Stokes v. Eagle LA, Inc.
| Michael Stokes |
| Eagle LA, Inc. |
| Avatar Club Los Angeles, Inc and Roes |
| 2:2022cv00702 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 5/23/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (vv)
|
| Filing 21 21 DAY Summons Issued re Third Party Complaint #19 as to Third-Party Defendant Avatar Club Los Angeles, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 20 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Third Party Complaint #19 filed by Third Party Plaintiff Eagle LA, Inc.. (Fox, J) |
| Filing 19 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Third-Party Defendant Avatar Club Los Angeles, Inc ; Jury Demand, filed by Third Party Plaintiff Eagle LA, Inc..(Fox, J) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court hereby orders that Defendants Cross-Complaint #13 and Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on a Third-Party Complaint are stricken for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order 10-07 and/or the Courts Case Management Order as indicated: Incorrect event selected. (Dkt. #13 ). Incorrect title of document. (Dkt. #13 ). No Third-Party Complaint on file. (Dkt. #15 ) THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #15 . The following error(s) was found: No Third-Party Complaint on file. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jp) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Crossclaim #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Third-Party Complaint - under Category - Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. (2) A third-party complaint is a pleading in which a defendant brings in a third party who is not a party in the original action. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 15 [STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 18] Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Crossclaim #13 filed by Counter Claimant Eagle LA, Inc.. (Fox, J) Modified on 3/21/2022 (vv). |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Eagle LA, Inc., (Fox, J) |
| Filing 13 [STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 18] CROSSCLAIM against Cross Defendant AVATAR CLUB LOS ANGELES, INC.; Jury Demand, filed by Cross Complainant Eagle LA, Inc..(Fox, J) Modified on 3/21/2022 (vv). |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Eagle LA, Inc..(Attorney J T Fox added to party Eagle LA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Fox, J) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael Stokes, upon Defendant Eagle LA, Inc. served on 2/17/2022, answer due 3/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bartender in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Eagle LA, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 A Copyright CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Eagle LA, Inc., identifying Sanders Law Group, Craig B. Sanders, Eagle LA, Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Eagle LA, Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eagle LA, Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Eagle LA, Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32717912 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Eagle LA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Eagle LA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
