Joshua J. Withers v. Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC
Plaintiff: Joshua J. Withers
Defendant: Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv00734
Filed: February 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: Request for Entry of Default against Defendant Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC #14 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. The Declaration of Service indicates that service was made upon Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC c/o Emilie S Golub, by serving Bob Golub, husband. The Declaration of Service does not indicate the relationship between defendant and Emilie S. Golub, and there is no proof of mail service thereafter. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (gk)
March 11, 2022 Filing 14 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC filed by Plaintiff Joshua J. Withers. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF CRAIG B. SANDERS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT, #2 Supplement Certificate of Service) (Sanders, Craig)
March 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: A responsive pleading was due on March 3, 2022. None has been filed, and Plaintiff has not sought entry of default or default judgment. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than March 16, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
March 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon the filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
March 10, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-00734-SB (PVCx). (et)
March 9, 2022 Filing 10 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Joshua J. Withers. (Sanders, Craig)
March 8, 2022 Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr)
February 11, 2022 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joshua J. Withers, upon Defendant Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC served on 2/10/2022, answer due 3/3/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bob Golub; Husband in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig)
February 3, 2022 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC. (ghap)
February 3, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap)
February 2, 2022 Filing 5 A Copyright CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joshua J. Withers, identifying Sanders Law Group, Craig B. Sanders, Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC. (Sanders, Craig)
February 2, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Joshua J. Withers. (Sanders, Craig)
February 2, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joshua J. Withers. (Sanders, Craig)
February 2, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joshua J. Withers. (Sanders, Craig)
February 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32725151 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Joshua J. Withers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Joshua J. Withers(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joshua J. Withers v. Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua J. Withers
Represented By: Craig B Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Super Sharp Entertainment, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?