United States of America v. 765,332.83 in Bank Funds Seized from Bank of America Account 4750
United States of America |
765,332.83 in Bank Funds Seized From Bank of America Account 4750 |
2:2022cv00736 |
February 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Civil Forfeiture |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, by Publication on 2/7/2022 and 2/8/2022 upon Defendant 765,332.83 in Bank Funds Seized From Bank of America Account 4750 last date of publication 3/8/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. Publication was made in the www.forfeiture.gov. (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 10 ORDER APPOINTING UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE AS SUBSTITUTE CUSTODIAN IN PLACE OF THE U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: Granting #9 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Appoint Substitute Custodian. [See Order for details.] (es) |
Filing 9 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Appoint Substitute Custodian United States Secret Service in place of United States Marshals Service filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff United States of America. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Attachments: #1 Corrected Complaint for Forfeiture)(Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (See document for details) (vmun) |
Filing 5 WARRANT for seizure of $765,332.83 in Bank Funds Seized from Bank of America Account 4750 issued on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Warrant for Seizure on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attorney Daniel G. Boyle added to party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(pty:pla))(Boyle, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States of America v. 765,332.83 in Bank Funds Seized from Bank of America Account 4750 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Daniel G. Boyle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: 765,332.83 in Bank Funds Seized From Bank of America Account 4750 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.