Alan Kheel v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. et al
| Alan Kheel |
| Santander Consumer USA, Inc. dba Chrysler Capital, Equifax Inc., TransUnion Corp., Santander Consumer USA, Inc. doing business as Chrysler Capital, DOES 1-10 inclusive and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC |
| 2:2022cv00752 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Amended Complaint/Petition #22 , for the following reasons: The time to file a First Amended Complaint (FAC) as a matter of course, pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(l)(A) or (B), is not applicable. Plaintiff may file a FAC pursuant to FRCP 15(a)(2), either by stipulation or by seeking the Court's leave. (iv)
|
| Filing 23 AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Alan Kheel re Amended Complaint/Petition #22 Plaintiff's Affidavit of Venue filed by Plaintiff Alan Kheel (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 22 **STRICKEN** First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant DOES, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Equifax Inc., Santander Consumer USA, Inc., TransUnion Corp. amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Alan Kheel(Friedman, Todd) Modified on 4/1/2022 Per Order #24 (iv). |
|
Filing 21
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 4/18/2022 at 11:00 AM. (iv)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-00752 MWF(MARx). (rn) |
| Filing 19 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc.. (Wenrick, Courtney) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc., identifying Santander Holdings, USA. (Wenrick, Courtney) |
| Filing 17 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 16 SCHEDULING NOTICE TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement as to Defendant Trans Union Corp. Only (ECF No. 14) does not relieve the parties from any of the applicable deadlines or other requirements in this action, including the deadline for filing consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, if the parties so elect. (See ECF Nos. 4, 7). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #12 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. A Notice of Interested of Parties shall be filed no later than February 14, 2022. (es) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement as to defendant Trans Union Corp only filed by plaintiff Alan Kheel. (Bacon, Adrian) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (es) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc..(Wenrick, Courtney) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC.(Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Withdrawal of Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #8 filed by defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, identifying Equifax, Inc.. (Attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr added to party EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC(pty:dft))(Quinn, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 [WITHDRAWN BY DEFENDANT SEE DKT. #10 ] ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Equifax Inc..(Attorney Thomas P Quinn, Jr added to party Equifax Inc.(pty:dft))(Quinn, Thomas) Modified on 2/4/2022 (es). |
| Filing 7 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (ch) |
| Filing 6 SCHEDULING NOTICE TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the notice of removal. Defendant is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the notice of removal, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the notice of removal. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc., re Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 served on 2/3/2022. (Wenrick, Courtney) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff TransUnion Corp., Equifax Inc., Santander Consumer USA, Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 12/29/2021, attached as Exhibit A (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. dba Chrysler Capital identifying Santander Holdings, USA as Corporate Parent. (Wenrick, Courtney) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. dba Chrysler Capital. (Wenrick, Courtney) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21VECV01771 Receipt No: ACACDC-32729339 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Santander Consumer USA, Inc. dba Chrysler Capital. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - TransUnion's Consent to Removal, #3 Exhibit C - Equifax Information Services Consent to Removal) (Attorney Courtney Camilla Wenrick added to party Santander Consumer USA, Inc. dba Chrysler Capital(pty:dft))(Wenrick, Courtney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
