George Jones v. Neal Rubin et al
| George Jones |
| Neal Rubin, Randall Rubin and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv00758 |
| February 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction- related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (iv)
|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff George Jonesto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #13 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter Shahriari, #2 Declaration of George Jones)(Steven, Laura) |
|
Filing 14
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that plaintiff may have alleged, pursuant to the Court's supplemental jurisdiction. The Court therefore orders plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than February 21, 2022. (lom)
|
| Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the Case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian and Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-00758-PA (MARx). (et) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Randall Rubin. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Neal Rubin. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff George Jones, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attached Face Page of Complaint)(Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attached Face Page of Complaint)(Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-32731981 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party George Jones(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
