Bradley D. Sharp v. The Strawberry Peak Trust et al
| Bradley D. Sharp |
| The Strawberry Peak Trust and Primus Trust Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00789 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-02188 DSF(MRWx). Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson to Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-00789 DSF(MRWx). Signed by Judge Dale S. Fischer (rn)
|
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Primus Trust Corporation, The Strawberry Peak Trust. (lh) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David Allen Castleman counsel for Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp. Adding David A. Castleman as counsel of record for Plaintiff, Bradley D. Sharp, as Receiver for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp, as Receiver. (Attorney David Allen Castleman added to party Bradley D. Sharp(pty:pla))(Castleman, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-2188-DSF-MRW; 2:21-cv-9183-DSF-MRW; 2:21-cv-9197-DSF-MRW (Phelps, Kathy) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp (Phelps, Kathy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp, identifying DIRECT LENDING INVESTMENTS, LLC, DIRECT LENDING INCOME FUND, L.P., DIRECT LENDING INCOME FEEDER FUND, LTD., DLI CAPITAL, INC., DLI LENDING AGENT, LLC, DLI ASSETS BRAVO, LLC; Development Specialists, Inc.; Primus Trust Corporation, Strawberry Peak Trust, Brendan Ross, Jill Ross, S.R.1, a minor child of Brendan Ross, S.R.2, a minor child of Brendan Ross. (Phelps, Kathy) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp. (Phelps, Kathy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp. (Phelps, Kathy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32740824 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Bradley D. Sharp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2) (Attorney Kathy Bazoian Phelps added to party Bradley D. Sharp(pty:pla))(Phelps, Kathy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
