Hector Alcaraz v. Steadfast Insurance Company
Hector Alcaraz |
Steadfast Insurance Company and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive |
2:2022cv00842 |
February 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
John E McDermott |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS #8 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The hearing date regarding this motion is continued from March 18, 2022, to April 8, 2022, at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 REPLY filed by Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company to Response in Opposition to Motion, #9 //Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply to Opposition (Marti, Angel) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Response in Opposition to Motion, #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 11-8 Memorandum/brief exceeding 10 pages shall contain table of contents. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 5/20/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 9 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case //Notice of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) #8 filed by Plaintiff Hector Alcaraz. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Igor Fradkin)(Fradkin, Igor) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case //Notice of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 2/18/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6), #2 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6), #3 Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6)) (Shimkin, David) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Hector Alcaraz in Los Angeles Superior Court on 10/25/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company, (Shimkin, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company. (Shimkin, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV39169 Receipt No: ACACDC-32750417 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Steadfast Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 3 to Notice of Removal) (Attorney David Shimkin added to party Steadfast Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Shimkin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.