Alejandro Hurtado v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
| Alejandro Furtado and Alejandro Hurtado |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv00899 |
| February 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
|
Filing 21
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. The court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. The final pretrial conference and hearing on motions in limine is scheduled for March 31, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. The trial is scheduled to begin on April 18, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. (iv)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER TO CONTINUE RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH #18 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for dates and deadlines.* (iv)
|
| Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 Court days, filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc... (Sargizian, Mikouya) |
| Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference from April 14, 2022 to June 13, 2022 filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order To Continue Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference)(Sargizian, Mikouya) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Order Setting Scheduling Conference filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Sargizian, Mikouya) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kimberly Marie Shappley counsel for Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. Filed by Defendant United Parcel Services, Inc.. (Shappley, Kimberly) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Mikouya Sargizian counsel for Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. Adding Miko Sargizian as counsel of record for United Parcel Service, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attorney Mikouya Sargizian added to party United Parcel Service, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sargizian, Mikouya) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/31/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 4/14/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 served on Notice to Counsel e Conset to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (Anderton, D) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. Of Serving Defendants Notice To State Court And Adverse Parties Of Removal Of Action To Federal Court On Plaintiff's Counsel (Shappley, Kimberly) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:22-cv-00899 FMO(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Shappley, Kimberly) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Alejandro Hurtado, upon Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. served on 1/10/2022, answer due 1/31/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Koy Saechao in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 1/18/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, United Parcel Service, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Alejandro Hurtado. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/16/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 2/08/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. identifying United Parcel Service, Inc. (Delaware) issues stock to the public; there are no publicly held companies that own 10% or more of United Parcel Service, Inc.s stock. United Parcel Service, Inc. (Delaware) wholly owns United Parcel Service of America, Inc., which wholly owns UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc., which wholly owns United Parcel Service Inc. (Ohio). United Parcel Service of America, Inc., UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc., and United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio) do not issue stock to the public. as Corporate Parent. (Shappley, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. Related Case(s): No Known Related Cases (Shappley, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Alejandro Hurtado, an individual; Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc., an Ohio corporation, Plaintiffs former employer; United Parcel Service, Inc., a Delaware corporation, a parent company of Defendant; United Parcel Service of America, Inc., a parent company of Defendant UPS. (Shappley, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court - Central, case number 21STCV45965 Receipt No: ACACDC-32763424 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Shannon Baisden ISO Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Kimberly M. Shappley ISO Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of Kimberly M. Shappley ISO Notice of Removal (Complaint), #4 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of Kimberly M. Shappley ISO Notice of Removal (Complaint and Related State Court Doucuments), #5 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of Kimberly M. Shappley ISO Notice of Removal (Answer to Complaint)) (Attorney Kimberly Marie Shappley added to party United Parcel Service, Inc.(pty:dft))(Shappley, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
