Shahram Saba v. Maria Sinutko et al
Plaintiff: Shahram Saba
Defendant: Maria Sinutko, Alonzo C Alvarado and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 2:2022cv00907
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2022 Filing 10 Receipt of Remand by Superior Court of Los Angles, Van Nuys on 2/17/2022 (lc)
February 14, 2022 Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles. (lom)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED (see comments above). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. (lom)
February 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) ORDER REMANDING MATTER TO STATE COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
February 10, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
February 10, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
February 10, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et)
February 9, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Alonzo C Alvarado. (et)
February 9, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Alonzo C Alvarado. (et)
February 9, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles, case number 21VEUD00323 with CONFORMED E-FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon., filed by Defendant Alonzo C Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shahram Saba v. Maria Sinutko et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shahram Saba
Represented By: Hasti Rahsepar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maria Sinutko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alonzo C Alvarado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?