Mohamed Suufi et al v. MediaLab.Ai, Inc.
| Mohamed Suufi and Sam Koch |
| MediaLab.Ai, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00979 |
| February 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The document (Dkt. No. #12 ) is accepted as filed. The Court will issue an order as to the parties' stipulation separately from this response. (jgr) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulations > Extending Time to Answer (More than 30 days). The filer used the event, Stipulations > Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), for docketing this filing. This filing, together with the prior stipulation, seeks a cumulative extension of time greater than 30 days. See Local Rule 8-3. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon Stipulation #12 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant to file a responsive pleading is extended to 5/13/2022. (gk)
|
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MediaLab.Ai, Inc. answer now due 5/13/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant MediaLab.Ai, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney William A. Delgado added to party MediaLab.Ai, Inc.(pty:dft))(Delgado, William) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MediaLab.Ai, Inc. answer now due 4/14/2022, filed by Plaintiffs Mohamed Suufi; Sam Koch.(Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mohamed Suufi, Sam Koch, upon Defendant MediaLab.Ai, Inc. served on 2/22/2022, answer due 3/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, Intake Specialist, CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon the filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant MediaLab.Ai, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Sam Koch, Mohamed Suufi, (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Sam Koch, Mohamed Suufi. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Sam Koch, Mohamed Suufi. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32782474 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Mohamed Suufi, Sam Koch. (Attorney Lawrence Timothy Fisher added to party Sam Koch(pty:pla), Attorney Lawrence Timothy Fisher added to party Mohamed Suufi(pty:pla))(Fisher, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
