Sarah Baxley v. Barton Associates Inc. et al
Sarah Baxley |
Barton Associates Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv01011 |
February 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dolly M Gee |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER TO STAY ACTION IN LIGHT OF SCHEDULED MEDIATION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #18 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action shall be stayed in light of the parties' scheduled mediation until 8/29/2022, at which time the parties shall submit a joint status report regarding the result of the mediation and whether the stay should be lifted. (gk) |
Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Mediation filed by defendant Barton Associates Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Stay Action in Light of Scheduled Mediation)(Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 17 ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #16 , IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Barton & Associates, Inc. to respond to Plaintiff Sarah Baxley's Complaint is extended until 4/6/2022. (gk) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to April 6, 2022 filed by Defendant Barton Associates Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint, #2 Proof of Service)(Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 15 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Transfer Pursuant to General Order 21-01 filed on February 16, 2022. Further, the scheduling conference set before Judge Walter on March 21, 2022 #10 is VACATED. See minute order for details. (lom) |
Filing 13 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:22-cv-00084-DMG-JCx. Case transferred from Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-01011-DMG-JCx. Signed by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (aco) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Barton Associates Inc. answer now due 3/23/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Barton Associates Inc..(Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal of Action with the Superior Court filed by Defendant Barton Associates Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice of Removal of Class Action (State Court))(Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for March 21, 2022 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before March 7, 2022. (iv) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Sarah Baxley in Los Angeles Superior Court on 1/11/2022, attached A. (jtil) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Barton Associates Inc., re Notice of Related Case(s) #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 02/14/2022. (Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Barton Associates Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:22-cv-00084-DMG-JC (Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Barton Associates Inc., identifying (1) Ryan Family 2011 Irrevocable Trust; and (2) Thomas F. Ryan 2008 Revocable Trust. (Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Barton Associates Inc.. (Holecek, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV01126 Receipt No: BCACDC-32791045 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Barton Associates Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael J. Holecek in Support of Defendant Barton & Associates, Inc.'s Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit D - First Amended General Order, #6 Exhibit E - Voluntary Efficient Litigation Stipulations, #7 Exhibit F - Proof of Service of Summons, #8 Exhibit G - Court Order Regarding Newly Filed Class Action, #9 Exhibit H - Initial Status Conference Order, #10 Exhibit I - Proof of Service of Initial Orders) (Attorney Michael J Holecek added to party Barton Associates Inc.(pty:dft))(Holecek, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.