Hwan Kim v. Carlos Maldonado et al
Hwan Kim |
Carlos Maldonado and Does 1 to 10 |
2:2022cv01058 |
February 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #5 as to Defendant Carlos Maldonado. (et) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #5 Hwan Kim. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Carlos Maldonado amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Hwan Kim(Kim, Jason) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Hwan Kim. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hwan Kim. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32803094 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Hwan Kim(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.