James Lee v. Sood Enterprises, Inc. et al
| James Lee |
| Sood Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Jack In The Box No 3565, Pratuang Vetayases and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2022cv01063 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING SUA SPONTE PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismisses Plaintiffs state law causes of action (claims two through five). Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff James Leeto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 10 MINUTES by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The parties are ORDERED to issue a joint status report at least seven days prior to the initial status conference. In that status report, Defendant should describe the measures it has taken to investigate and/or remedy the alleged barriers. If Defendant implemented remedial measures, Plaintiff should state their position regarding those measures. Both parties should state whether and when they intend to move for summary judgment. The Court further ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unuh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause within 14 days of this order. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367(c). See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) |
|
Filing 9
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Sood Enterprises, Inc., Pratuang Vetayases. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 James Lee. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Lee. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32803581 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party James Lee(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
