Ying Jin v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Ying Jin |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Emilia Bardini |
2:2022cv01119 |
February 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
John F Walter |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Ying Jin. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv) |
Filing 6 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv) |
Filing 5 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (et) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ying Jin. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY OF RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF MANDMUS against Defendants Emilia Bardini, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Filing fee $ 402 Paid), filed by Plaintiff Ying Jin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.