Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC v. Evanston Insurance Company et al
| Universal Garment Wash & Dye, LLC and Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC |
| Evanston Insurance Company, SUSAN SIRKIN dba Sirkin Insurance Agency, DOES 2-20, Doe, Susan Sirkin doing business as Sirkin Insurance Agency and Does 2 through 20 |
| 2:2022cv01128 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| John E McDermott |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV37506, acknowledged on 4/11/2022. (gk) |
| Filing 19 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, Stanley Mosk Courthouse. (gk) |
Filing 18
ORDER ON DEFENDANT EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") regarding this Court's jurisdiction on 3/9/2022 #10 . In response to this Court's OSC, Evanston withdrew its Notice of Removal and agreed to a remand of the case to state court #16 . Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV37506. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #11 and Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim of Evanston Insurance Company #12 are DENIED as moot. All hearings and other scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. (gk)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION Notice of Withdrawal #16 filed by Plaintiff Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC. (Burgee, John) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Withdrawal of Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Evanston Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schultz, Pamela) |
|
Filing 15
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court hereby sets Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Action to State Court and Request for Costs #11 and Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Cross-Complaint or Evanston Insurance Company #12 for hearing on April 22, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. Further, the scheduling conference #9 on April 15,2022 is continued to April 22, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim of Evanston Insurance Company #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. The document notices the motion for hearing on 4/22/2022 at 9:30 AM. The filer set this matter for hearing on 4/29/2022 at 9:30 AM. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. The document notices the motion for hearing on 4/22/2022 at 9:30 AM. The filer set this matter for hearing on 4/29/2022 at 9:30 AM. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaim of Evanston Insurance Company filed by Counterdefendant Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 4/29/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Burgee, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 4/29/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Burgee, John) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Evanston Insurance Company's failure to establish the citizenship of Plaintiff's owners or members in its Notice of Removal, Evanston is ordered to show cause in writing by no later than 3/23/2022 why this action should not be remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to file a response to Evanston's arguments regarding the timeliness of Evanston's removal or Evanston's assertions regarding whether Susan Sirkin dba Sirkin Insurance Agency remains a defendant in this action, Plaintiff may also file its response by 3/23/2022. See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/1/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Evanston Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Dent, Susan) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Evanston Insurance Company, Susan Sirkin, Does 2 through 20 amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 12/14/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ].(et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Susan Sirkin, Does 1 through 20,, filed by Plaintiff Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/30/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Universal Garment Wash and Dye, LLC pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Defendant Susan Sirkin dba Sirkin Insurace Agency ONLY. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/16/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT C TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Evanston Insurance Company identifying Markel Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Schultz, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Evanston Insurance Company. (Schultz, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV37506 Receipt No: ACACDC-32816615 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Evanston Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Pamela L Schultz added to party Evanston Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Schultz, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
