Zachary Roberts v. The Young Turks, Inc.
| Zachary Roberts |
| The Young Turks, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv01190 |
| February 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Steve Kim |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Young Turks, Inc. answer now due 4/15/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant The Young Turks, Inc..(Attorney Bradley J Mullins added to party The Young Turks, Inc.(pty:dft))(Mullins, Bradley) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Zachary Roberts, upon Defendant The Young Turks, Inc. served on 2/23/2022, answer due 3/16/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Amy Mclaren, Managing Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant The Young Turks, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Zachary Roberts. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Zachary Roberts, identifying Sanders Law Group, Craig B. Sanders, The Young Turks, Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Zachary Roberts. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Zachary Roberts. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32827354 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Zachary Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of the Photographs) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Zachary Roberts(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zachary Roberts v. The Young Turks, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zachary Roberts | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Young Turks, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alexandra Leigh Anfuso |
| Represented By: | Bradley J Mullins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
