Charles Hwang v. Test Rite Products Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Charles Hwang
Defendant: Test Rite Products Corporation, O Reilly Automotive, Inc. and DOES 1-10
Case Number: 2:2022cv01259
Filed: February 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John W Holcomb
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2022 Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to O Reilly Automotive, Inc. answer now due 4/28/2022; Test Rite Products Corporation answer now due 4/27/2022, filed by Plaintiff Charles Hwang.(Burroughs, Scott)
March 14, 2022 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Charles Hwang, upon Defendant Test Rite Products Corporation served on 3/7/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kelly Ho in c/o Jane Shan - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott)
March 8, 2022 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Charles Hwang, upon Defendant O Reilly Automotive, Inc. served on 3/8/2022, answer due 3/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System/Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service by mail and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva)
March 2, 2022 Filing 11 This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John W. Holcomb, United States District Judge. Judge Holcomb is located in Courtroom 2, on the 2nd Floor of the George E. Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501. Additional information regarding Judge Holcomb's procedures and schedules is available on the Court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg to Judge John W. Holcomb and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-01259 JWH(SHKx). (rn)
February 24, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants O Reilly Automotive, Inc., Test Rite Products Corporation. (lh)
February 24, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
February 24, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
February 24, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh)
February 23, 2022 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Charles Hwang. (Burroughs, Scott)
February 23, 2022 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Charles Hwang. (Burroughs, Scott)
February 23, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charles Hwang, (Burroughs, Scott)
February 23, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Charles Hwang. (Burroughs, Scott)
February 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32839821 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Charles Hwang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint) (Attorney Scott A. Burroughs added to party Charles Hwang(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charles Hwang v. Test Rite Products Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles Hwang
Represented By: Scott A. Burroughs
Represented By: Frank Trechsel
Represented By: Trevor William Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Test Rite Products Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: O Reilly Automotive, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?