Raymond Matamoros v. Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC
Raymond Matamoros |
Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC, Nicole Duval and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive |
Phyllis Cheng |
2:2022cv01308 |
February 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Phyllis Cheng has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Phyllis W. Cheng, Esq. may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Plaintiff Raymond Matamoros(Salazar, Theida) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Raymond Matamoros pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Nicole Duval. (Salazar, Theida) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michelle C Freeman on behalf of Defendant Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC (Attorney Michelle C Freeman added to party Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC(pty:dft))(Freeman, Michelle) |
Filing 13 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 12 PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The DOE defendants remaining after 5/16/2022 are dismissed by operation of this Order and without further notice. The Court vacates the mandatory scheduling conference set for 3/25/2022 and issues this case management order. The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) report #10 and sets the pretrial and trial dates noted in this order based on an evaluation of the complexity of the case. Defendants argue that Nicole Duval is a "sham defendant" whose citizenship should not be considered in determining diversity jurisdiction. The parties are ordered to meet and confer about whether Duval is a legally appropriate defendant given the nature of Plaintiff's claims. If the parties are unable to resolve the issue via meet and confer, then the parties are each ordered to file, by not later than 4/11/2022, a brief on whether this case should be remanded to state court due to incomplete diversity. Jury Trial set for 1/17/2023 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 1/6/2023 10:00 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties (Hearing Deadline) 5/16/2022. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 7/15/2022. Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 7/22/2022. Non-Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 7/22/2022. Settlement Conference Deadline 8/5/2022. Post-Settlement Status Conference set for 8/19/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Report due by 8/12/2022. Trial Filings (First Set) Deadline 12/16/2022. Trial Filings (Second Set) Deadline 12/23/2022. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk) |
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC.. (Grix, Monte) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raymond Matamoros, (Salazar, Theida) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets an in-person Scheduling Conference set for hearing on March 25, 2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by March 15, 2022. (jgr) |
Filing 7 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon the filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (sh) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by defendant Does, Nicole Duval, Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 02/24/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT NO. 3 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](sh) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against plaintiff Raymond Matamoros. Jury Demanded, filed by defendant Nicole Duval, Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC, Does.[FILED IN STATE COURT ON 01/21/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ] (sh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC, identifying Raymond Matamoros, Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC, Marriott Hotel Services, Inc., and Marriott International, Inc.. (Grix, Monte) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC. (Grix, Monte) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California-Central District, case number 22STCV02515 Receipt No: ACACDC-32852943 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANT Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF MONTE K. GRIX IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT, #2 Exhibit A TO MONTE K. GRIX DECLARATION Complaint, #3 Exhibit B TO MONTE K. GRIX DECLARATION - Answer to Complaint, #4 Exhibit C TO MONTE K. GRIX DECLARATION - Notice to State Court of Removal, #5 Declaration OF CAROL FRENSILLI IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT) (Attorney Monte Kyle Grix added to party Residence Inn By Marriott, LLC(pty:dft))(Grix, Monte) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.