Bosco Baek v. Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
| Bosco Seungchul Baek |
| Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv01509 |
| March 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Alka Sagar |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTICE AND ORDER TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES RE THIRD STIPULATION FOR AN ORDER FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (DKT. #14 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4 et seq. and/or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following deficiency has been found with your electronically-filed document. Documents with proposed orders requiring the judge's signature must be emailed to the chambers email (Word version required) along with the PDF version of the electronically-filed document; see L.R. 5-4.4.2. Counsel shall comply by no later than May 3, 2022, or the document may be stricken for failure to comply with the Local Rules. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 Third STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation of Counsel)(Kessler, Michael) |
| Filing 13 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bosco Seungchul Baek answer now due 4/29/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Sunrise Credit Services, Inc..(Kessler, Michael) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sunrise Credit Services, Inc., identifying Plaintiff, Bosco Seungchul Baek. (Kessler, Michael) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. answer now due 4/21/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Sunrise Credit Services, Inc..(Attorney Michael Isaac Kessler added to party Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kessler, Michael) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bosco Seungchul Baek, upon Defendant Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. served on 3/10/2022, answer due 3/31/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corp - Daisy Montenegro, Process Specialist - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Veggian, Lauren) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Bosco Seungchul Baek. (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bosco Seungchul Baek, identifying None. (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bosco Seungchul Baek. (Cardoza, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32898022 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Bosco Seungchul Baek. (Attorney Michael Frederick Cardoza added to party Bosco Seungchul Baek(pty:pla))(Cardoza, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bosco Baek v. Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bosco Seungchul Baek | |
| Represented By: | Michael Frederick Cardoza |
| Represented By: | Lauren B Veggian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sunrise Credit Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Isaac Kessler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
