Fabric Selection, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc. et al
| Fabric Selection, Inc. |
| Walmart, Inc., Zhao Meng, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Walmart Inc., Does 1 through 10 inclusive and BFE Corporation |
| 2:2022cv01557 |
| March 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Otis D Wright |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc., upon Defendant Walmart Inc. served on 4/19/2022, answer due 5/10/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon The Corporation Trust Company c/o Amy McLaren\Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants BFE Corporation, Zhao Meng, Walmart Inc. (lc) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who havepending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerks Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #5 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (rolm) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (rolm) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (rolm) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (rolm) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc., identifying Walmart, Inc.; Zhao Meng; BFE Corporation. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Burroughs, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32913356 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Fabric Selection, Inc.. (Attorney Scott A. Burroughs added to party Fabric Selection, Inc.(pty:pla))(Burroughs, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
