Israel Maldonado Ramirez v. Motion producer
Israel Maldonado Ramirez |
Motion producer and Producer Universal Studios |
2:2022cv01588 |
February 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Dolly M Gee |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned addressed to Israel Maldonado Ramirez re Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P), #4 (hr) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned addressed to Israel Maldonado Ramirez re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge (CV-25) #3 (hr) |
Filing 4 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #2 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lom) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (sh) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez. (sh) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendant Motion producer pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo., filed by Plaintiff Israel Maldonado Ramirez. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.