Elizabeth Karr v. William Glavin et al
| Elizabeth Karr |
| William Glavin, Glavin and Kolter, Citigroup, Inc., Citigroup Pension Plan and Does 1 through 5 |
| 2:2022cv01629 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 23) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Court grants the motion. Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint within seven days. See document for details. (smo)
|
| Filing 24 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, Amended Complaint, Defendants Citigroup Inc., and Citigroup Pension Plan's Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc..(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to amend complaint filed by plaintiff Elizabeth Karr. Motion set for hearing on 6/6/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Attachments: #1 proposed amended complaint, #2 Proposed Order) (Cole, Russell) |
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER RE: STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE DEADLINE #21 .The stipulation is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rules 15-1 and 15-2 and Initial Standing Order. Any renewed stipulation must attach a complete and separate proposed Second Amended Complaint, along with a "redline" version tracking all additions and deletions. Additionally, the stipulation is denied for failure to present good cause to extend the time for the Citigroup parties to respond to the anticipated Second Amended Complaint beyond the 14 days provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). (lc)
|
| Filing 21 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend filed by Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant William Glavin, identifying Attorney Protective; National Liberty & Fire Insurance Company. (Saunders, Jennifer) |
| Filing 19 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant William Glavin.. (Saunders, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 6/27/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (ECF NO. #14 ) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The Court orders that the deadline for Defendants Citigroup Inc. and Citigroup Pension Plan to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to May 4, 2022. (lom)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brian W. Sullivan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc and designating Matthew J. Sharbaugh as local counsel #12 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brian W. Sullivan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32988285) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. (lt) |
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to May 4, 2022 re Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew Sharbaugh, #2 Proposed Order)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/28/2022 to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant William Glavin. (SEE AS EXHIBIT 15 ATTACHED TO SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal docket no. 13) (lc) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed on 9/30/21 (exhibit 1) AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed on 1/26/2022 against All Defendants(exhibit 11) in state court filed by plaintiff Elizabeth Karr amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (SEE AS EXHIBITS ATTACHED TO SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal docket no. 13) (lc) |
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Brian W. Sullivan to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32988285) filed by Defendant Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE filed by Defendant William Glavin. Notice of Filing of William P. Glavin's State Court Answer to First Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Filing of William P. Glavin's State Court Answer to First Amended Complaint)(Saunders, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE #9 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Defendants Citigroup Inc. and Citigroup Pension Plan 's deadling to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is extended to April 4, 2022. (lc)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Citigroup, Inc., Citigroup Pension Plan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Matthew Sharbaugh, #2 Proposed Order)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc., re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on March 14, 2022. (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc., Does, William Glavin, Glavin and Kolter amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Elizabeth Karr. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc., identifying Citigroup Inc.. (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Citigroup Pension Plan, Citigroup, Inc.. (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV35967 Receipt No: ACACDC-32935951 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Citigroup, Inc., Citigroup Pension Plan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Matthew J Sharbaugh added to party Citigroup Pension Plan(pty:dft), Attorney Matthew J Sharbaugh added to party Citigroup, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
