John Peter Archer v. Lieff Cabraser Heinman and Bernstein LLP
| John Peter Archer |
| Lieff Cabraser Heinman and Bernstein LLP, Yaman Salahi and Jalle Dafa |
| 2:2022cv01731 |
| March 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Related to: Order of Dismissal #13 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Dale S. Fischer: denying #12 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The referral to the magistrate judge (Dkt. 3) is VACATED; 2. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 12) is DENIED; 3. The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 4. Judgment shall be entered in accordance herewith. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction; Permanent Restraining Order; Upon CSP-LAC, and Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann, Bernstein, LLP, et al. filed by Plaintiff John Peter Archer.(jdo) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE (In Chambers) Order re Motions (Dkt. 7-10) and Directing Proposed First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 6) Be Lodged by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. All of the Motions (Dkt. 7, 8, 9, 10) are DENIED. The Court takes no action at this time on the Proposed First Amended Complaint other than directing that it be lodged. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION REQUEST THE "COURT", "GRANT", EXPENSE(S), AMOUNT. PURPOSE IN, REQUIREMENT BY CSP-LAC, LEGAL LAW LIBRARY(S) ADMINISTRATED filed by Plaintiff John Peter Archer. (et) |
| Filing 9 MOTION TO SET, RECORD(S) "COURT", TENSE, IN SETTING filed by Plaintiff John Peter Archer. (et) |
| Filing 8 MOTION FOR ADJUSTMENT OF NAME, AND INSIGNATORY STATUS OF NAME filed by Plaintiff John Peter Archer. (et) |
| Filing 7 MOTION: ALL CASE, RECORD(S), ENTIRE CASE, CONFIDENTIAL UNDER SEAL filed by Plaintiff John Peter Archer.(et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF LODGING Proposed Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff John Peter Archer (nbo) |
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 from John Peter Archer. Re: Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), #1 . Receipt number LA236603. (dl) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE (In Chambers) Order Directing Plaintiff to Pay the Required Filing Fee or Submit a Compliant Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Clarify Plaintiff's Capacity in this Action by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. The Court hereby grants Plaintiff 30 days from the date of this Order to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filling and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a proper request to proceed IFP. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Blank CV-60P Form, #2 Blank Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff John Peter Archer against Defendants Jalle Dafa, Lieff Cabraser Heinman and Bernstein LLP, Yaman Salahi, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
