Mary King v. OptumRX, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Mary King
Defendant: Optumrx, Inc., UnitedHealth Group and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Interested Party: UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Optum Services, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv01745
Filed: March 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patricia Donahue
Referring Judge: Dolly M Gee
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO BINDING ARBITRATION AND TO STAY ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Joint Stipulation #9 is APPROVED. The parties are ordered to proceed to binding arbitration based on the terms set forth in their Stipulation. All court proceedings are STAYED and this action is administratively closed pending the outcome of arbitration. The court shall retain jurisdiction to confirm, correct, or vacate the arbitration award. The parties shall file a joint status report within one week after the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk)
March 21, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant UnitedHealth Group.(Lyftogt, Marissa)
March 17, 2022 Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION for Order Binding Arbitration and to Stay Pending Action filed by Defendant UnitedHealth Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Lyftogt, Marissa)
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
March 16, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
March 16, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
March 16, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (jtil)
March 16, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Patricia Donahue. New Case Number 2:22-cv-01745 DMG (PDx). (jtil)
March 14, 2022 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Mary King in Los Angeles Superior Court on 2/7/2022, attached to the Lyftogt Decl. as Exhibit A-6. (jtil)
March 14, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant UNITEDHEALTH GROUP, identifying UnitedHealth Group Incorporated; Optum Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lyftogt, Marissa)
March 14, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant UNITEDHEALTH GROUP. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Lyftogt, Marissa)
March 14, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV03344 Receipt No: ACACDC-32937818 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant UNITEDHEALTH GROUP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Marissa Lyftogt, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of of Marissa Lyftogt, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration of of Marissa Lyftogt, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration of of Marissa Lyftogt, #5 Declaration of Yolanda Kondan, #6 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Marissa L Lyftogt added to party UNITEDHEALTH GROUP(pty:dft))(Lyftogt, Marissa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mary King v. OptumRX, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary King
Represented By: Jores Kharatian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Optumrx, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UnitedHealth Group
Represented By: Jordan Ryan Turner
Represented By: Rita Leong
Represented By: Marissa L Lyftogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Represented By: Jordan Ryan Turner
Represented By: Rita Leong
Represented By: Marissa L Lyftogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Optum Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?