A.T. v. Cognosphere, LLC et al
| A.T. |
| Cognosphere, LLC doing business as HoYoverse, miHoYo Co., Ltd. and Cognosphere, LLC |
| 2:2022cv01761 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to the First Amended Complaint #17 by Judge Josephine L. Staton Cognosphere, LLC's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint is extended by 60 days up to and including 7/5/2022. (jp)
|
| Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to July 5, 2022 re Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Defendant Cognosphere, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond)(Attorney Michelle S Ybarra added to party Cognosphere, LLC(pty:dft))(Ybarra, Michelle) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff A.T., upon Defendant Cognosphere, LLC served on 4/12/2022, answer due 5/3/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jennifer Lo, Employee, NW Registered Agent, Inc., Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendant miHoYo Co., Ltd. (jp) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendant Cognosphere, LLC. (jp) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff A.T.. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff A.T.. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Cognosphere, LLC, miHoYo Co., Ltd. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff A.T.(Fisher, Lawrence) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE JURISDICTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why the Complaint should not be dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order. (See document for further information). (jp)
|
| Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants Cognosphere, LLC, miHoYo Co., Ltd.. (rolm) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (rolm) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (rolm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (rolm) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff A.T.. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff A.T., (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff A.T.. (Fisher, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32961262 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff A.T.. (Attorney Lawrence Timothy Fisher added to party A.T.(pty:pla))(Fisher, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
