Robert Barreras v. City of Los Angeles et al.
Plaintiff: Robert Barreras
Defendant: City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Does 1-20, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as police officers for the Los Angeles Police, Does 1-20, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as police officers for the Los Angeles Police Department and Does 21-40, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as sheriffs deputies for the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department
Case Number: 2:2022cv01797
Filed: March 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Ronald SW Lew
2 Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
May 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER [In Chambers] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The complaint was filed on March 17, 2022; and the answer was filed on April 25, 2022. The DOE defendants remaining after July 22, 2022 are dismissed by operation of this Order and without further notice. The Court vacates the mandatory scheduling conference set for May 20, 2022 and issues this case management order. The deadlines below will not be continued absent a timely showing of good cause. See minute order for deadlines and other information. (lom)
May 10, 2022 Filing 20 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras.. (Lacy, DeWitt)
April 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, AS A PARTY FROM THE ACTION, PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Upon Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) #18 , Defendant City of Los Angeles is hereby DISMISSED as a party to the action. Defendant's motion to dismiss #14 is therefore denied as moot. (gk)
April 28, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Quesada, Julia)
April 25, 2022 Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, identifying Plaintiff Robert Barreras and County of Los Angeles. (Fuentes, Raymond)
April 25, 2022 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Raymond J Fuentes added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Fuentes, Raymond)
April 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court sets an in-person Scheduling Conference set for hearing on May 20, 2022 at 8:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by May 10, 2022. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jgr)
April 14, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of Los Angeles filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 5/20/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Decl. of Colleen R. Smith, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Order re Judicial Notice re LASD, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Claim for Damages, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C - LASD Information Center Booking Details, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D - Letter to Pf re Dismissal of City, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D - C. Smith Letter to Pf's Counsel re Dismissal, #7 Declaration Decl. of Sgt. Valle, #8 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Defendant City of Los Angeles' Motion to Dismiss) (Attorney Colleen R Smith added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft)) (Smith, Colleen)
April 7, 2022 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 4/5/2022, answer due 4/26/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Katherine Medina, Deputy Clerk, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Due Diligence 03/25/2022, #2 Affidavit of Due Diligence 04/04/2022)(Quesada, Julia)
April 7, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Crystal Jones, City Clerk, in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Quesada, Julia)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon the filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-01797 SB(JPRx). (rn)
March 18, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #4 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Other Filings Notices Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb)
March 18, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 County of Los Angeles) (sh)
March 18, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh)
March 18, 2022 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
March 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (sh)
March 17, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras. (Quesada, Julia)
March 17, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request for County of Los Angeles)(Quesada, Julia)
March 17, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras. (Quesada, Julia)
March 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32969019 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Robert Barreras. (Attorney Julia N Quesada added to party Robert Barreras(pty:pla))(Quesada, Julia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert Barreras v. City of Los Angeles et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Barreras
Represented By: DeWitt M Lacy
Represented By: John Leonard Burris
Represented By: Lena Pearl Andrews
Represented By: Julia N Quesada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Represented By: Colleen R Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Los Angeles
Represented By: Raymond J Fuentes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as police officers for the Los Angeles Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as police officers for the Los Angeles Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 21-40, inclusive, individually and in their official capacities as sheriffs deputies for the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?