Regina Ralbag v. Donna Jaffe et al
| Regina Ralbag |
| Donna Jaffe, Pamela Rose and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2022cv01804 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Otis D Wright |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Receipt of remand from Los Angeles County Superior Court, Santa Monica on 4/6/2022 (lc) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Santa Monica. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. 21SMUD00770. (lc) |
Filing 11
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #2 , #3 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court lacks jurisdiction over this unlawful detainer action #10 . This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc)
|
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court, Santa Monica Courthouse filed by Plaintiff Regina Ralbag. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Attorney Helen G Long added to party Regina Ralbag(pty:pla)) (Long, Helen) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for May 16, 2022 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Donna Jaffe, Pamela Rose. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by defendant Donna Jaffe. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed by defendant Pamela Rose. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for County of Los Angeles, case number 21SMUD00770 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Margaret A Rocconi., filed by defendants Pamela Rose, Donna Jaffe. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Notice of Removal, #1 filed by Defendants Donna Jaffe, Pamela Rose. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/1/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A)(ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
