Mijeong Kim v. Blue Triton Brands et al
Plaintiff: Mijeong Kim
Defendant: Blue Triton Brands, Amazon.com Inc, Mohammadrez Shahrbabki and DOES 1 through 10
Case Number: 2:2022cv01907
Filed: March 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
2 Judge: Dolly M Gee
3 Judge: Karen L Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 40 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss ; Memorandum of Points & Authorities #37 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court sua sponte continues the scheduling conference #35 from June 24, 2022 to July 1, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 18, 2022 Filing 38 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss ; Memorandum of Points & Authorities #37 / Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Blue Triton Brands. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Declaration of Alexander M. Smith)(Spelman, Kate)
May 18, 2022 Filing 37 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss ; Memorandum of Points & Authorities filed by Defendant Blue Triton Brands. Motion set for hearing on 7/1/2022 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Spelman, Kate)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Charles C. Sipos to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Amazon.com, Inc., designating Jasmine Wei-Ming Wetherell as local counsel #31 . (gk)
May 11, 2022 Filing 35 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/10/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 6/24/2022 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
May 10, 2022 Filing 33 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Transfer Pursuant to General Order 21-01 filed on May 9, 2022. Please substitute the initials DMG in place of the current initials, so that the case number will now read CV 22-1907-DMG (KSx). (iv)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-10901 DMG(KSx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Judge Fred W. Slaughter to Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-01907 DMG(KSx). Signed by Judge Dolly M. Gee (rn)
May 9, 2022 Filing 31 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles C. Sipos to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Amazon.com Inc (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33263252) filed by defendant Amazon.com Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Wetherell, Jasmine)
May 6, 2022 Filing 30 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Blue Triton Brands. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-10901-DMG (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Spelman, Kate)
May 6, 2022 Filing 29 Notice of Interested Parties re: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #28 (Rosenblit, Joseph)
May 5, 2022 Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Mohammadrez Shahrbabki #27 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel must comply with Local Rule 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
May 4, 2022 Filing 27 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Mohammadrez Shahrbabki.(Attorney Joseph Chaim Rosenblit added to party Mohammadrez Shahrbabki(pty:dft))(Rosenblit, Joseph)
May 3, 2022 Filing 26 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Charles Sipos. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jp)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 REASSIGNMENT ORDER by Judge Fred W. Slaughter: Please refer to Order for complete details. (jp)
April 27, 2022 Filing 24 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Amazon.com Inc answer now due 5/27/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. Amazon.com Inc.(Wetherell, Jasmine)
April 27, 2022 Filing 23 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jasmine Wei-Ming Wetherell counsel for Defendant Amazon.com Inc. Adding Jasmine W. Wetherell as counsel of record for Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Amazon.com, Inc.. (Attorney Jasmine Wei-Ming Wetherell added to party Amazon.com Inc(pty:dft))(Wetherell, Jasmine)
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#OCJ 22-059) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Slaughter, Fred W., this case is transferred from Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha to the calendar of Judge Fred W. Slaughter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-01907-FWS-Ex. (rn)
April 15, 2022 Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim, upon Defendant Mohammadrez Shahrbabki served on 4/8/2022, answer due 4/29/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mohammadrez Shahrbabki in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hong, Juan)
April 15, 2022 Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Madeline Paige Skitzki counsel for Defendant Blue Triton Brands. Adding Madeline P. Skitzki as counsel of record for BlueTriton Brands, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc.. (Attorney Madeline Paige Skitzki added to party Blue Triton Brands(pty:dft))(Skitzki, Madeline)
April 15, 2022 Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Blue Triton Brands answer now due 5/18/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Blue Triton Brands.(Spelman, Kate)
April 15, 2022 Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alexander M. Smith counsel for Defendant Blue Triton Brands. Adding Alexander M. Smith as counsel of record for BlueTriton Brands, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc.. (Attorney Alexander M. Smith added to party Blue Triton Brands(pty:dft))(Smith, Alexander)
April 15, 2022 Filing 17 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kate Spelman counsel for Defendant Blue Triton Brands. Adding Kate T. Spelman as counsel of record for BlueTriton Brands, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant BlueTriton Brands, Inc.. (Attorney Kate Spelman added to party Blue Triton Brands(pty:dft))(Spelman, Kate)
April 8, 2022 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim, upon Defendant Amazon.com Inc served on 4/6/2022, answer due 4/27/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC - Cynthia Jones in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hong, Juan)
April 5, 2022 Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Amazon.com Inc. (lc)
April 4, 2022 Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #13 filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim. (Hong, Juan)
April 4, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #12 . The following error(s) was found: The case number and/or judge(s)initials are incorrect. CASE NUMBER MISSING. Official case number is to read as: 2:22-cv-01907-FLA-Ex. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc)
April 3, 2022 Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim. (Hong, Juan)
March 28, 2022 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim, upon Defendant Blue Triton Brands served on 3/28/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corp-John Montijo in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hong, Juan)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
March 23, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Amazon.com Inc, Blue Triton Brands, Mohammadrez Shahrbabki. (Attachments: #1 Amazon.com, #2 Mohammadrez Shahrbabki) (sh)
March 23, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh)
March 23, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sh)
March 23, 2022 Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim. (Hong, Juan)
March 23, 2022 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim. (Hong, Juan)
March 23, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim. (Hong, Juan)
March 23, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim, (Hong, Juan)
March 23, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim. (Hong, Juan)
March 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32997205 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Mijeong Kim. (Attorney Juan Hong added to party Mijeong Kim(pty:pla))(Hong, Juan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mijeong Kim v. Blue Triton Brands et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mijeong Kim
Represented By: Juan Hong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Blue Triton Brands
Represented By: Kate Spelman
Represented By: Alexander M. Smith
Represented By: Madeline Paige Skitzki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc
Represented By: Charles C. Sipos
Represented By: Jasmine Wei-Ming Wetherell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mohammadrez Shahrbabki
Represented By: Joseph Chaim Rosenblit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?