State Farm General Insurance Company v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY |
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., CYBER POWER SYSTEMS (USA) INC., Cyber Power Systems USA, Inc. and Does 1-20, Inclusive |
2:2022cv01946 |
March 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Gail J Standish |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 1/24/2023. (vv) |
Filing 15 Order re Court Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/20/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Bench Trial set for 4/18/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (vv) |
Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv) |
Filing 13 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 3. Parties request for private mediation. Filed by Plaintiff State Farm General Insurance Company (Long, Michael) |
Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Scheduling Conference Report ; estimated length of trial 3 Days, filed by Plaintiff State Farm General Insurance Company.. (Long, Michael) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer APPROVING Joint Stipulation to Continue Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference #9 to 5/16/2022. See Order for specifics. (jp) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Answer filed by Defendant Cyber Power Systems USA, Inc..(Attorney Christoffer M Gaddini added to party Cyber Power Systems USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gaddini, Christoffer) |
Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION to Continue RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from May 2, 2022 to May 16, 2022 filed by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE)(Dixon, Robert) |
Filing 8 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 5/2/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (vv) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer&'s Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (vv) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. Filed in State Court on 3/22/2022 Submitted with Attachment 4 Exhibit 3 to Notice of Removal #1 . (Attorney Matthew Lippold added to party Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.(pty:dft))(car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Cyber Power Systems USA, Inc., Does 1-20, Inclusive, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., filed by Plaintiff State Farm General Insurance Company. Filed in State Court on 10/7/2021 Submitted with Attachment 2 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., identifying Home Depot, Inc. (parent company of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.); Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.; Cyber Power Systems (USA), Inc.; and State Farm General Insurance Company.. (Dixon, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.. (Dixon, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21BBCV00891 Receipt No: ACACDC-33006167 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF ROBERT K. DIXON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.S NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION, #2 Exhibit 1 - COMPLAINT, #3 Exhibit 2 - SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT, #4 Exhibit 3 - DEFENDANT HOME DEPOT U.S.A.,, INC.'S STATE COURT ANSWER, #5 Exhibit 4 - STATE FARM'S COMPANY PROFILE, #6 Exhibit 5 - CYBER POWER BUISNESS SEARCH PROFILE, #7 Exhibit 6 - OTHER PROCESS, PLEADINGS, ETC.) (Attorney Robert Kenneth Dixon added to party HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.(pty:dft))(Dixon, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.