Vladimir Mkrtchyan v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
| Vladimir Mkrtchyan |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, a Delaware Company, Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips RS North America LLC, Philips North America LLC and Does 1 to 100, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv01950 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Western District of Pennsylvania, 2:22-cv-00620 filed 4/27/2022. (iv) |
| Filing 13 Conditional Transfer Order - 23 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3014, transferring case to USDC, Western District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv) |
| Filing 12 Conditional Transfer Order - 23 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3014. (iv) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC. (iv) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Shahrokh, Koorosh) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 filed by Plaintiff Vladimir Mkrtchyan. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Complaint Facesheet)(Shahrokh, Koorosh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Vladimir Mkrtchyan. (Shahrokh, Koorosh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Vladimir Mkrtchyan. (Shahrokh, Koorosh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33006609 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Vladimir Mkrtchyan. (Attorney Koorosh Kaikhosrow Shahrokh added to party Vladimir Mkrtchyan(pty:pla))(Shahrokh, Koorosh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
