Alfredo Lozano et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC et al
Plaintiff: Alfredo Lozano and Milagro Lozano
Defendant: Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, MAURILIO VELAZQUEZ and Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv01953
Filed: March 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2022 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Alfredo Lozano, Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. served on February 22, 2022. (Tahmassebi, Arya)
April 27, 2022 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Alfredo Lozano, Maurilio Velazquez; served on proof of service. (Tahmassebi, Arya)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, ANDCONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha : Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/3/2023 01:00 PM; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 3/3/2023 at 01:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 3/28/2023 08:30 AM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 01/27/2023. (tf)
April 18, 2022 Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the court VACATES the April 29, 2022, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
April 15, 2022 Filing 11 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 3. Parties request for private mediation. Filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, Maurilio Velazquez(Beagle, Ashley)
April 15, 2022 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, Maurilio Velazquez.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PreTrial Worksheet)(Beagle, Ashley)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 4/29/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
March 25, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
March 25, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
March 25, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et)
March 25, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice (Other) #3 . The following error(s) was found: A claim initiating document was filed using a non-claim initiating event in CM/ECF. As a result, the case was not properly classified in the CM/ECF system. The error has been corrected by re-docketing the claim initiating document using the correct event. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (et)
March 25, 2022 FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. ACACDC-33007620 for $402 filing fee. (Beagle, Ashley)
March 24, 2022 CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, Maurilio Velazquez, Does 1 to 100 inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Alfredo Lozano, Milagro Lozano. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/14/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et)
March 24, 2022 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, Maurilio Velazquez. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (Attorney Mohammad Tabel added to party Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Mohammad Tabel added to party Maurilio Velazquez(pty:dft)) (et)
March 24, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Los Angeles-Stanley Mosk, case number 22STCV05383 Receipt No. ACACDC-33007620 for $402 filing fee. filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, MAURILIO VELAZQUEZ. (Beagle, Ashley) Modified on 3/25/2022 (et).
March 24, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, MAURILIO VELAZQUEZ, (Attorney Ashley Brodersen Beagle added to party Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Ashley Brodersen Beagle added to party MAURILIO VELAZQUEZ(pty:dft))(Beagle, Ashley)
March 24, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, MAURILIO VELAZQUEZ. (Beagle, Ashley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alfredo Lozano et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alfredo Lozano
Represented By: Michael Anthony Sanchez
Represented By: Arya Mehdi Tahmassebi
Represented By: Giancarlo J Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Milagro Lozano
Represented By: Michael Anthony Sanchez
Represented By: Arya Mehdi Tahmassebi
Represented By: Giancarlo J Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC
Represented By: Ashley Brodersen Beagle
Represented By: Mohammad Anwar Tabel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAURILIO VELAZQUEZ
Represented By: Ashley Brodersen Beagle
Represented By: Mohammad Anwar Tabel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?