Sheron Howard v. United States of America et al
Sheron Howard |
United States of America and Does 1 to 50, inclusive |
2:2022cv01969 |
March 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patricia Donahue |
Stephen V Wilson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff SHERON HOWARD. (Romero, Vanessa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SHERON HOWARD, (Romero, Vanessa) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant SHERON HOWARD. (Romero, Vanessa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33009186 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff SHERON HOWARD. (Attorney Vanessa Marie Romero added to party SHERON HOWARD(pty:bkmov))(Romero, Vanessa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.