Go Maps, Inc. v. Insurance Claims Associates Agency Inc.
Go Maps, Inc. |
Insurance Claims Associates Agency, Inc. |
2:2022cv01973 |
March 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss (1) PLAINTIFF GO MAPS, INC.S COMPLAINT, AS TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION (FRCP 12(b)(6)), AND (2) STRIKE GO MAPS, INC.S ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES ACT (FRCP 12(f)) #19 filed by Defendant Insurance Claims Associates Agency, Inc.. (Rubin, G) |
Filing 24 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Tayback, Christopher) |
Filing 23 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss (1) PLAINTIFF GO MAPS, INC.S COMPLAINT, AS TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION (FRCP 12(b)(6)), AND (2) STRIKE GO MAPS, INC.S ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES ACT (FRCP 12(f)) #19 filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc.. (Tayback, Christopher) |
Filing 22 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties (Local Rule 7.1) of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc., (Tayback, Christopher) |
Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: PROPOSED ORDER ONLY TO THE NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss (1) PLAINTIFF GO MAPS, INC.S COMPLAINT, AS TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION (FRCP 12(b)(6)), AND (2) STRIKE GO MAPS, INC.S ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES ACT (FRCP 12(f)) [19-1]. The following error(s) was/were found: L.R. 58-10 at least 2 lines of text must accompany the Signature Line for Signature of Judge on a last page of proposed order In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 20 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 5/27/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss (1) PLAINTIFF GO MAPS, INC.S COMPLAINT, AS TO THE THIRD AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION (FRCP 12(b)(6)), AND (2) STRIKE GO MAPS, INC.S ALLEGATIONS REGARDING THE UNFAIR INSURANCE PRACTICES ACT (FRCP 12(f)) filed by Defendant Insurance Claims Associates Agency, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 5/27/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rubin, G) |
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: granting #16 Non-Resident Attorney Stephen R. Neuwirth APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Go Maps, Inc., designating Christopher Tayback as local counsel. (lom) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney David B. Adler APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Go Maps, Inc., designating Christopher Tayback as local counsel. (lom) |
Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stephen R. Neuwirth to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 4/1/2022, Receipt No. 33054540) filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tayback, Christopher) |
Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Adler to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500.00 Previously Paid on 4/1/2022, Receipt No. 33054335) filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tayback, Christopher) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stephen R. Neuwirth to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33054540) #12 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Adler to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33054335) #11 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken. (lc) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stephen R. Neuwirth to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33054540) #12 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Adler to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33054335) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section I of this Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in Section II, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. See Instructions for Applicants (1). (lt) |
Filing 12 STRICKEN PER 4/5/2022 COURT G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO.14) APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stephen R. Neuwirth to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33054540) filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tayback, Christopher) Modified on 4/5/2022 (lc). |
Filing 11 STRICKEN PER 4/5/2022 COURT G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO.14) APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney David B. Adler to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33054335) filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Tayback, Christopher) Modified on 4/5/2022 (lc). |
Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Insurance Claims Associates Agency, Inc. answer now due 4/8/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Insurance Claims Associates Agency, Inc..(Rubin, G) |
Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney David B Adler on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Stephen R Neuwirth on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant INSURANCE CLAIMS ASSOCIATES AGENCY INC., (Rubin, G) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant INSURANCE CLAIMS ASSOCIATES AGENCY INC.. (Rubin, G) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 22STCV03587 Receipt No: ACACDC-33009748 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant, INSURANCE CLAIMS ASSOCIATES AGENCY INC. INSURANCE CLAIMS ASSOCIATES AGENCY INC.. (Attorney G David Rubin added to party INSURANCE CLAIMS ASSOCIATES AGENCY INC.(pty:dft))(Rubin, G) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc., upon Defendant Insurance Claims Associates Agency, Inc. served on 2/23/2022, answer due 3/16/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Danied Deschamps, Registered Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/28/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant Insurance Claims Associates Agency, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Go Maps, Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/28/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.