Antonio Fernandez v. Fountain Square Liquor, Inc.
| Antonio Fernandez |
| Fountain Square Liquor, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv01974 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On May 16, 2022, the clerk entered default as to Defendant #18 . The Order to Show Cause dated May 11, 2022 #16 is hereby discharged. Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within 30 days of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint #13 . Having reviewed and considered Plaintiff's response to the Court's Order to Show Cause #14 , the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim. The Court also declines Plaintiff's request to invite the California Attorney General to weigh in on the issue. Should the State seek to file an amicus brief addressing Plaintiffs' concerns, it is welcome to do so without invitation. The Court therefore dismisses the state law claim without prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 18 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Fountain Square Liquor, Inc., a California Corporation. (gk) |
| Filing 17 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Fountain Square Liquor, Inc. filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Seabock, Amanda) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 25, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant Fountain Square Liquor, Inc. served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mina Hanna clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandezto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Order to Show Cause,,, #13 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by 4/21/2022. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of any such claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Zachary Manning Best on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Zachary Manning Best added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Best, Zachary) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Aaina Duggal on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Aaina Duggal added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Duggal, Aaina) |
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Fountain Square Liquor, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33009814 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
