Antonio Fernandez v. Chang Mo Kang
Antonio Fernandez |
Chang Mo Kang |
2:2022cv01981 |
March 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Michael R Wilner |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Chang Mo Kang answer now due 5/21/2022, filed by Defendant Chang Mo Kang.(Attorney Eric A Kuzdenyi added to party Chang Mo Kang(pty:dft))(Kuzdenyi, Eric) |
Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the foregoing, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility state claims asserted in the Complaint. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (iv) |
Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, re Response #19 , Notice of Appearance #18 (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandezto Order to Show Cause,, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Dennis J. Price, #2 Declaration Declaration of Christopher A. Seabock)(Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher A Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Krista R Hemming on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Hemming, Krista) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant Chang Mo Kang served on 3/31/2022, answer due 4/21/2022. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, re Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20),, #9 served on 4/4/2022. (Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Krista R Hemming on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Krista R Hemming added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Hemming, Krista) |
Filing 13 Notice of Withdrawal of Notice of Appearance #12 filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Zachary William Davina on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Zachary William Davina added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Davina, Zachary) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher A Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Christopher A Seabock added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Christopher) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald.Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing as to why this Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the other state law claims alleged by Plaintiff. The Response shall be filed on or before April 14, 2022. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court's declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (iv) |
Filing 9 NOTICE to Parties Re (ADR-20) ADA Disability Access Litigation/Application for Stay and Early Mediation: PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED to serve the ADA Packet on Defendant(s) at the same time the summons and complaint are served, if possible. If, upon receipt of this Notice to Parties, Plaintiff has already served Defendant(s), Plaintiff must serve the ADA Packet no later than fourteen (14) days after this Notice to Parties is filed by the Court. Within three (3) days of serving Defendant(s), Plaintiff must file with the Court a proof of service indicating that the ADA Packet was served on Defendant(s). *See Notice for further details.* (smom) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Chang Mo Kang. (jtil) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33010430 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.