Great American Insurance Company v. Fast Track Construction Corp. et al
| Great American Insurance Company |
| Fast Track Construction Corp., dba Fast Track Construction, Richard Tyler, Richard Tyler, as a Trustee of the Richard and Randy Tyler 2010 Trust, Randy Tyler, Randy Tyler, as Trustee of the Richard and Randy Tyler 2010 Trust and Fast Track Construction Corp. doing business as Fast Track Construction, a California corporation |
| 2:2022cv02200 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Otis D Wright |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company, Proof of Electronic Service Regarding Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference served on May 27, 2022. (Baghdassarian, Alex) |
Filing 17
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for August 1, 2022 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 DISCLOSURE of CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Defendant Fast Track Construction Corp. (Rudman, Bruce) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Fast Track Construction Corp., Randy Tyler(as Trustee of the Richard and Tyler 2010 Trust), Randy Tyler(an individual), Richard Tyler(as a Trustee of the Richard and Randy Tyler 2010 Trust), Richard Tyler(an individual).(Attorney Bruce D Rudman added to party Fast Track Construction Corp.(pty:dft), Attorney Bruce D Rudman added to party Randy Tyler(pty:dft), Attorney Bruce D Rudman added to party Randy Tyler(pty:dft), Attorney Bruce D Rudman added to party Richard Tyler(pty:dft), Attorney Bruce D Rudman added to party Richard Tyler(pty:dft))(Rudman, Bruce) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Fast Track Construction Corp. dba Fast Track Construction, a California corporation (lc) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Randy Tyler.as Trustee of the Richard and Tyler 2010 Trust. (lc) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Randy Tyler, an individual. (lc) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Richard Tyler, as a Trustee of the Richard and Randy Tyler 2010 Trust. (lc) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Richard Tyler(an individual). (lc) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Summons Request (5 total) #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer erroneously added his filing date on all 5 summons forms and is advised that area is for ONLY for the clerk to enter at time of issuance. Since no summons were issued at the time case was opened and that summons request is a clerk's process, clerk will assist this time ONLY and process the summons by separate entry. Please do not enter date in future summons requests. Therefore NO response to this notice is required.. (lc) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Baghdassarian, Alex) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Courts Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerks Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Courts Website and Judges procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, identifying Santa Ana Unified School District, Fremont, Santa Ana United School District, Romero Cruz Academy, Watershed Conservation Authority, Lawndale Elementary School District, Antelope Valley Transit Authority, Oxnard Union High School District, County of Riverside, United States Forest Service. (Baghdassarian, Alex) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company. (Baghdassarian, Alex) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33061796 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Alex R Baghdassarian added to party Great American Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Baghdassarian, Alex) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
