Lois O Brien v. Ray Exley et al
Defendant: Lois O Brien
Respondent: Juliana Loza-Exley, Ray Exley and Jill Loza-Exley
Interested Party: Juliana Loza
Claimant: Athena Medical Group Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan Number 1, Athena Medical Group Inc. Defined Contribution Pension Plan Number 3, The Athena Medical Group Inc. Retirement Trust and Athena Medical Group Inc. Nevada
Case Number: 2:2022cv02256
Filed: April 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Pedro V Castillo
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2022 Filing 32 Mail Returned addressed to Lois O Brien re Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #28 (rolm)
August 5, 2022 Filing 31 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal- Remand to Superior Court (rolm)
June 28, 2022 Filing 30 Mail Returned addressed to Lois O Brien re Order on Motion for Pro Se Electronic Filing - CV-5 O, #21 (rolm)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Respondent Loza-Exleys request for reconsideration and vacatur of the remand order is denied. Not only does the motion fail to present a cognizable claim for relief, but the Court is without jurisdiction to consider Exleys motion. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) (An order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise). Moreover, the Notice of Removal lacked any ground for subject matter jurisdiction, and was an untimely and objectively unreasonable attempt to have this Court modify rulings made in a state court proceeding. The Court therefore DENIES Loza-Exleys request. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 27, 2022 Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REMAND #27 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco)
June 24, 2022 Filing 27 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REMAND filed by RESONDENT Juliana Loza-Exley. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of JULIANA LOZA, #2 Exhibit 101 Minute Order State Civil, #3 Exhibit 102 Minutes Order TRO, #4 Exhibit 103 MetLife attempt at Insurance Fraud, #5 Exhibit 104 Directing OBrien to transfer MetLife Policy, #6 Exhibit 105 Gen Am 1979 DB Policy, #7 Exhibit 106 IRS DOL LETTERS DETERMINATION, #8 Exhibit 107 Athena DB 5500) (Loza-Exley, Juliana)
June 22, 2022 Filing 26 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. BD468094. (lc)
June 21, 2022 Filing 25 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMAND. Petitioner is awarded fees of $6,960.56. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS ) #11 . Case is Remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BD468094. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (lc)
June 14, 2022 Filing 24 DECLARATION of Alisa M. Morgenthaler in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 and Dkt. No. 23 filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Morgenthaler, Alisa)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 SCHEDULING NOTICE-IN CHAMBERS ORDER/TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien #11 : The hearing on the motion to remand previously scheduled for 06/13/22 at 1:30 p.m. is vacated and off-calendar. The motion is GRANTED. An accompanying order shall issue. Counsel for Petitioner is ORDERED to file a billing statement or other documents corroborating the requested fee award by Thursday, June 16, 2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 27, 2022 Filing 22 REPLY support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Morgenthaler, Alisa)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: granting #17 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (lom)
May 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
May 20, 2022 Filing 19 SCHEDULING NOTICE re: MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 - The hearing previously scheduled for 06/10/2022 at 10:00 am has been rescheduled to 6/13/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:17-cv-02410 SVW(AJWx). Case transferred from Judge Andre Birotte Jr to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-02256 SVW(PVCx). Signed by Judge Stephen V. Wilson (rn)
May 12, 2022 Filing 17 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Defendant Juliana Loza Exley. (lom)
May 4, 2022 Filing 16 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien, (Morgenthaler, Alisa)
May 4, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Petitioner Lois O'Brien re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Morgenthaler, Alisa)
May 4, 2022 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien, re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 served on May 4, 2022. (Morgenthaler, Alisa)
May 4, 2022 Filing 13 EXHIBIT 17-31 to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit)(Morgenthaler, Alisa)
May 4, 2022 Filing 12 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit)(Morgenthaler, Alisa)
May 4, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Petitioner Lois O Brien. Motion set for hearing on 6/10/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attorney Alisa M Morgenthaler added to party Lois O Brien(pty:pet)) (Morgenthaler, Alisa)
April 21, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Correct event: Applications/Ex Parte Applications/ Motions/Petitions/Requests > Substitute Attorney (G-01). The filer used the event, Notices > Withdrawal (Document or Motion). Lacking proof of service upon pro se party, F.R.Civ.P. 5. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
April 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Request for Approval of Substitution of Defendant Jill Loza-Exley, pro se, in place of Attorney Jerry Kaplan #8 . (gk)
April 15, 2022 Filing 8 [REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY filed as] Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, #7 filed by Respondent Juliana Loza Exley. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kaplan, Jerry) Modified on 4/21/2022 (lom). Modified on 4/21/2022 (lom).
April 14, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Jerry Kaplan to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Respondent Juliana Loza Exley. Motion set for hearing on 5/20/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Kaplan, Jerry)
April 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (pg)
April 8, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately. The correct event category is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. (car)
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
April 8, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
April 8, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car)
April 4, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BD468094 Receipt No: ACACDC-33071760 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Juliana Loza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Attorney Jerry Kaplan added to party Juliana Loza(pty:ip))(Kaplan, Jerry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lois O Brien v. Ray Exley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lois O Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Juliana Loza
Represented By: Jerry Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Juliana Loza-Exley
Represented By: Jerry Kaplan
Represented By: Joan Kenegos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ray Exley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jill Loza-Exley
Represented By: Jerry Kaplan
Represented By: Joan Kenegos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Athena Medical Group Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan Number 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Athena Medical Group Inc. Defined Contribution Pension Plan Number 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: The Athena Medical Group Inc. Retirement Trust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Athena Medical Group Inc. Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?