Antonio Fernandez v. The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC
| Antonio Fernandez |
| The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC |
| 2:2022cv02257 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (vv)
|
| Filing 16 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Grammatico, Paul) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-02257 DSF(MAAx). (rn) |
| Filing 14 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC. (Grammatico, Paul) |
| Filing 13 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (ib) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock counsel for Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. Ariel Vento is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC answer now due 6/3/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC.(Attorney Paul A Grammatico added to party The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC(pty:dft))(Grammatico, Paul) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): Notice to Consent re Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Magistrate Judges Program by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Plaintiff is advised that this case is designated as a Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to Magistrate Judges Program, and the Notice to Counsel (ECF No. 7) is also required to be served on any defendants. Accordingly, plaintiff shall promptly serve the Notice to Counsel and Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge and file an appropriate proof of service. re: Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #7 . See Order for further details. (es)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, upon Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC served on 4/14/2022, answer due 5/5/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS CSC - LAWYERS INCORPORATING SERVICE; Koy Saechao- Customer Representative in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California LLC. (sh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Claire Cylkowski on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Claire Cylkowski added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Cylkowski, Claire) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Ariel Elizabeth Vento on behalf of Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez (Attorney Ariel Elizabeth Vento added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Vento, Ariel) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez, (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33072432 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Antonio Fernandez. (Attorney Amanda Lockhart Seabock added to party Antonio Fernandez(pty:pla))(Seabock, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
