Chen Shterenbach v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Chen Shterenbach |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Donna P. Campagnolo, John M. Allen and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2022cv02269 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants John M. Allen, Donna P. Campagnolo, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.(Attorney Jennifer R. Jacobs added to party John M. Allen(pty:dft), Attorney Jennifer R. Jacobs added to party Donna P. Campagnolo(pty:dft), Attorney Jennifer R. Jacobs added to party United States Citizenship and Immigration Services(pty:dft))(Jacobs, Jennifer) |
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-02269 SB(JCx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Chen Shterenbach. (Weiss, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chen Shterenbach, upon Defendant John M. Allen served on 4/6/2022, answer due 6/6/2022; Donna P. Campagnolo served on 4/6/2022, answer due 6/6/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 4/6/2022, answer due 6/6/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to return receipt still outstanding. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to return receipt still outstanding. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to return receipt still outstanding. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Weiss, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants John M. Allen, Donna P. Campagnolo, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chen Shterenbach. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Weiss, Jonathan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chen Shterenbach. (Weiss, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chen Shterenbach, (Weiss, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33073732 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Chen Shterenbach. (Attorney Jonathan David Weiss added to party Chen Shterenbach(pty:pla))(Weiss, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
