Stevie Lee Boston v. John Doe I et al
| Stevie Lee Boston |
| John Doe I, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II |
| 2:2022cv02299 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Karen E Scott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Eastern District of California, 2:22-cv-00655 filed 4/12/2022. (iv) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. [See Order for details.] (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (lh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Jane Doe I, John Doe I, Jane Doe II pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Filed by Plaintiff Stevie Lee Boston. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
