Jennie Bennett v. General Scientific Corporation et al
| Jennie Bennett |
| General Scientific Corporation and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv02315 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan #11 filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation. (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 22 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett.. (Villicana, Claudette) |
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE #14 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: (1) The hearing on Defendant's Motion is CONTINUED to July 15, 2022 at 1:30 PM #11 ; (2) Defendant shall file its Reply brief no later than two weeks before the new date of the hearing on Defendant's Motion, in accordance with Local Rule 7-11; (3) The Scheduling Conference currently on calendar for June 17, 2022, is hereby CONTINUED to July 15, 2022, at 1:30 PM; and (4) The Parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report must be filed no later than twoweeks before the new date of the Scheduling Conference. (lc)
|
| Filing 20 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT ; estimated length of trial 4-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett.. (Villicana, Claudette) |
| Filing 19 First STIPULATION to Continue Defendants Motion to Transfer Venue, or in the alternative, Transfer Venue from June 17, 2022 to July 8, 2022 Re: Stipulation to Continue,, #14 filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE)(Villicana, Claudette) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Continue, #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: SEE BELOW UNDER OTHER. Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. pdf is the proposed order to no. 14, However filer re-filed before Judge issued response docket no. 17. Nevertheless, incorrect procedure used. See under other. Other error(s) with document(s): As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order is submitted as a Separate Attachment thereto.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
|
Filing 17
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Proposed Order re Stipulation to Continue [14-1] by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Filer shall immediately Lodge on the docket a corrected Proposed Order pursuant to L.R.-11-3.8. In addition, email the WORD version to chambers at FLA_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. (lc)
|
| Filing 16 First STIPULATION to Continue Defendants Motion to Transfer Venue, or in the alternative, Transfer Venue from June 17, 2022 to July 8, 2022 Re: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #15 filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett.(Villicana, Claudette) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE PROPOSED ORDER ONLY to the Stipulation to Continue,, #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. Proposed order Missing Formal Tile page and its LR-11-3.8 required filer, attorney, court and case information. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 14 First STIPULATION to Continue Defendants Motion to Transfer Venue, or in the alternative, Transfer Venue from June 17, 2022 to July 8, 2022 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan #11 , MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion,,, #13 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #12 filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER)(Villicana, Claudette) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan #11 PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF ROBERT A. ODELL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE, #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF JENNIE BENNETT IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE)(Villicana, Claudette) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 6/17/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 6/17/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of STANLEY STRINGFELLOW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GENERAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONS MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE, #2 Declaration of CAROL PETERSON IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GENERAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONS MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE, #3 Proposed Order GRANTING DEFENDANT GENERAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATIONS MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER VENUE) (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to General Scientific Corporation answer now due 5/13/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation.(Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation, re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Request for Judicial Notice, #4 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on April 11, 2022. (Kading, Theresa) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett, upon Defendant General Scientific Corporation acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 3/9/2022, answer due 3/30/2022. Submitted with Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, General Scientific Corporation. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Jennie Bennett. Filed in State Court on 4/6/2022 Submitted with Attachment Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GENERAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1332, 1441, AND 1446 (DIVERSITY) filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation. (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation, (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation. (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22LBCV00069 Receipt No: ACACDC-33085462 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant General Scientific Corporation. (Attorney Theresa A Kading added to party General Scientific Corporation(pty:dft))(Kading, Theresa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
